Mensch Leute, gebt doch diesem Dienst erstmal Zeit sich zu etablieren, bevor ....

[Ralph]

Ihr ihn lahmlegt ! http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biggrin.gif

***********************************************************
Sex-P2P Tauschservice geht on- und gleich wieder offline

Sex sells. Mit Leechnet gibt es nun auch eine Tauschbörse für die Liebhaber von Bildern äußerst nackter Menschen. Die Software, die von dem US-Unternehmen angeboten wird, ermöglicht es, ähnlich wie bei Napster, pornografisches Material nach dem Peer-to-Peer-Prinzip auszutauschen. Gesucht wird hier allerdings nicht nach Musiktiteln, sondern nach Haarfarbe, Körperform des Lieblingsmodells oder bevorzugten Sexualpraktiken. Das Grundprinzip bleibt erhalten: wer Bilder haben will, muß auch selbst anbieten. Das Angebot ist in englischer, japanischer und schwedischer Sprache verfügbar.

Nachdem der Service nun einige Tage online ist, stellen sich allerdings auch schon die ersten Probleme ein. Der Server ist wegen Überlastung immer wieder zusammengebrochen und arbeitet in aktiven Zeiten nur äußerst langsam.
***********************************************************

Ralph

[Gast_B]

Na so was, der Urtrieb der Menschen (oder soll ich besser sagen... der Männer http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/tongue.gif ) legt heutzutage schon ganze Server lahm http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biglaugh.gif http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biglaugh.gif http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biglaugh.gif

[Ralph]

Mooooomente mal Brigitte,

von wegen nur Männer ! .... ich zitiere:

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Trebuchet MS, Verdana, Tahoma, Arial, Helvetica">Zitat:</font><HR>.... Tauschbörse für die Liebhaber von Bildern äußerst nackter Menschen ....[/quote]

Da steht nichts von Männern !!!!! http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biggrin.gif

Bitte objektiv bleiben ! http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/wink.gif http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biggrin.gif

Ralph

[Dieser Beitrag wurde von Ralph am 01.12.2000 editiert.]

[Gast_B]

*kicher* Also ich wage mal zu behaupten, dass der Server niemals von weiblichen Nutzern überlastet worden wäre. Nee nee Ralph, die meisten Frauen haben bessere Ideen, wie man sich amüsieren kann http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biggrin.gif http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/tongue.gif http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/tongue.gif

[Trüffelschwein]

Auja, erzähl mal. California Dreamboys live? Oder lieber Slip-Werfen bei Ricky Martin? http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/tongue.gifhttp://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/tongue.gifhttp://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/tongue.gif

Ciao, T.

[Gast_B]

http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biglaugh.gif http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biglaugh.gif http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biglaugh.gif Nö Trüffelschwein, gaaaanz falsch getipt!

[Gert]

Bin ganz Ohr!!!!


Gerthttp://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/wink.gif

[Trüffelschwein]

O.K. Noch ein Versuch: Plätzchen backen und Socken stricken.http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biglaugh.gif

Ciao, T.

[Gast_B]

Tststs, und da heißt es immer Frauen wären neugierig http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biglaugh.gif

Ok, dann versuche ich mal meine Meinung zu erklären. Also mir als Frau bringt es absolut nichts, mir irgendwelche wildfremden (bei so einer Tauschbörse wahrscheinlich noch meist dickbäuchigen) nackten Männer anzukucken. Das hat für mich genauso wenig mit Sexualität zu tun wie Plätzchen backen oder Socken stricken http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biggrin.gif Nee, da kann selbst ein banales Gespräch, selbst nur ein Telefongespräch, mit einem interessanten Mann mehr Reize haben. Also ich denke für Frauen ist der Kontakt sehr wichtig, reines Anschauen ist irgendwie witzlos. Männer empfinden das eher anders, außerdem ist es ja auch im allgemeinen so, dass man von Frauen einfach schönere Bilder machen kann als von Männern. Von daher meinte ich das ja nicht herablassend sondern wollte nur ein bisserl lästern http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/wink.gif

Es ist ja schön für die Männer, dass sie sich schon an so kleinen Dingen erfreuen können (dafür haben wir Frauen es bei der Kontaktaufnahme meist leichter http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/tongue.gif ). Aber für mich müsste ein Mann schon supergut aussehen, damit ein Bild überhaupt erst mal Interesse bei mir erweckt, und mehr als ein angenehmer Anblick wäre das dann aber auch nicht für mich.

So, alle Klarheiten beseitigt http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/smile.gif

[Sascha]

Sagen wir es doch mal so: Wenn wir Männer nicht mit so einem massiven Trieb von der Natur ausgestattet wären, würden wir feststellen, daß es nur unter Männern wahre Freundschaft gibt. http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biglaugh.gif

Exor

[Gert]

Mensch Brigitte,

Du bringst mich auf eine Idee, ich werde eine 0190-Mummer schalten, um geplagte Boersen-Ladys Beistand zu geben, natürlich nur platonisch!!!

Vieleicht wird es dann ein Imperium wie von den Haffas!!!http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biggrin.gif

Mit Höhen und Tiefen!!http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biggrin.gif

Vieleicht kann ich mir dann wieder meine Kohle wiederholen!!

Ist jetzt aber nur ein kleiner Scherz!

Gerthttp://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/wink.gif

[Gast_B]

http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biglaugh.gif http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biglaugh.gif Hey Gertimaus, das ist vielleicht DIIEEE Geschäftsidee!!

Da bin ich doch gleich dabei. Du übernimmst die Börsen-Seelsorge für Frauen und ich die für Männer. Und Ruckzuck haben wir unsere Verluste wieder drinnen http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/biggrin.gif

[Trüffelschwein]

Da habe ich doch einen interessanten Artikel zum Thema "Männlein und Weiblein" gefunden, den möchte ich euch nicht vorenthalten. Ein wenig länglich, aber m.E. sehr aufschlußreich...

Move over Casanova

When you're single no one wants to know. Yet the minute you get a partner, the others come running. Ever wondered why, asks Jonathan Knight


BEFORE I got married a few weeks ago, friends told me that flashing a wedding ring was a sure way to attract female attention. Some said it was because women consider married men to be safe. Others said a wedding band is a quick way for women to identify a quality mate, one that's been pre-filtered by someone else.

So in the interests of science, I have been spending more time in bars lately. As I sip my pint of California microbrew, I keep my left hand clearly visible and wait. And wait. So far, I would call the results inconclusive.

It's really not all that far-fetched an idea, though. Females of other species copy the preferences of their peers all the time. Female quail, for example, prefer a male they have just seen copulating. And female guppies go for the more popular male, even if he is a bit of a wimp. Now researchers at the University of Louisville, Kentucky, have compelling evidence that people--particularly women--engage in mate copying too. Just hearing that other women want to date a man piques their interest.

The effects of peer attention could factor into a variety of social phenomena: why a bushy beard and tangled locks were sexy in the seventies but today's hair can't be short enough, or why teens pierce parts of their bodies adults rarely even think about. They could help explain the unexpected sex appeal of Mick Jagger or Jack Nicholson, and may be at work in celebrity of all kinds. Everyone wants to be unique, but when it comes to mating, imitation appears to have some powerful evolutionary advantages.

Until recently, all the evidence of mate copying has come from fish and birds. That's partly because it's easier to spot in these animals than in humans. Male grouse, for example, gather at special sites called leks where all the action takes place. Leks are the grouse equivalent of a singles bar. Here they strut around displaying their feathers in the hope of pulling a bird. Females wander through the lek, choose a male, mate on the spot--here the singles bar analogy breaks down a bit--and then head off into the undergrowth to nest. Some males on the lek have all the luck. The most successful may win up to 80 per cent of the passing females.

So what do the females see in these Casanovas? Some researchers suspected that mate copying was initiating a snowball effect: once a few females chose the same guy, the rest would come running. In 1994, behavioural biologists tested this idea by placing several stuffed female dummies on a black grouse lek near randomly chosen males. The eager cocks courted and mounted the dummies, sometimes for up to half an hour, which gave passing females lots of time to notice. Sure enough, the lucky males ended up mating with more real females on that day than either the day before or the day after.

Other experiments in the lab showed a similar effect in fish known as river bullheads. Unlike male grouse, who play no part in raising their offspring, bullhead males are attentive fathers. They guard the eggs and stay with hatchlings until they are old enough to survive on their own. And female bullheads will always try to spawn with males that already have nests containing eggs. It looked as though both grouse and fish females were copying others as a shortcut to finding a good mate.

True, there are other explanations for these behaviours. In the case of the grouse, the females might simply have been stimulated by the sight of the males' prolonged encounters with the dummies--normal grouse copulations are almost instantaneous. Similarly, bullhead females might have other reasons for their preference. For example, by laying their eggs in nests that are already occupied, they decrease the chances of them being eaten by predators.

But such objections to mate copying have been sidelined in recent years, in part because of the work at Louisville by biologist Lee Dugatkin. In 1996, Dugatkin got female guppies to change their mind about which male they liked best solely on account of the preferences of other females. Normally, female guppies like orange. Given a choice, a female will go with the brightest orange male she can find. This may be because the most vividly coloured males tend to be the boldest, and will confront approaching predators. (The researchers added weight to this idea with an experiment in which they trapped a drab male in a glass cylinder and held him right up close to a large fish. Females that saw this happening subsequently preferred this drab male to a more orange one held further away.)

Dugatkin and his colleagues wanted to see if they could override the fish's genetically based preference for orange. They built a fish tank with two smaller tanks attached, one containing an orange male and the other holding a drab one. A female plopped in the middle tank would court the orange male through the glass. The same female was liable to change her mind, however, if she was first held in the middle by a clear cylinder while a second female was trapped by a Plexiglas divider so that she could only swim close to the drab male. For want of anything better, she courted the drab male. When she was removed, along with the dividers, the original female would start courting the drab male rather than the orange one.

Several other cases of mate copying have been reported since then. Last year David White and Bennett Galef of McMaster University in Ontario reported findings from a similar experiment with Japanese quail using cages instead of tanks. In this case, the males were equally "attractive" but one was allowed to mate with a female for ten minutes, while the other was by himself. When the cages were lifted, the female most often courted the male that had just mated. Similar studies have also turned up mate copying in Japanese madaka fish, sailfin mollies and swordtails.

The prevalence of copying suggests it must give the copier some edge in evolution, though exactly what this is remains unclear. One good reason for copying might be that it saves time choosing a mate--time that could be spent doing other things, such as eating or looking out for predators. Or it may be simply that choosing a quality mate is tricky, and by watching what others do, you get more information on which to base this tough choice. This strategy fails, of course, if the individual you copy knows less than you do. But the fact that young guppies tend to copy old ones rather than the other way around suggests that here, at least, copying may be a way of passing down accumulated wisdom.

Birds and fish aren't renowned for their intelligence, though. So perhaps they rely on imitation because they tend not to do much thinking on their own. They follow the flock. They go with the flow. Would independent-minded human beings, with the power of reason and free choice, care about the choices other people make?

To find out, Dugatkin teamed up with psychologist Michael Cunningham, also at Louisville. They presented 166 female undergraduates with a report ostensibly written by five of their peers after a 20-minute interview with a man named Chris. In fact, the five women and Chris were all fictitious. The reports ranked Chris's physical attractiveness on a scale of 1 to 10, and indicated how many of the women were interested in dating him.

The reports rated Chris as either a 3 or a 10 in attractiveness. In addition, four, one or none of the women said she was interested in dating him. Once they had read the reports, the women undergraduates were asked how interested they might be, on a scale of 0 to 6, in dating Chris. A high attractiveness rating raised the women's interest by just over a point on average compared with a low rating. But peer attention had a stronger effect, raising the average dati

[reg]