PDA

Vollständige Version anzeigen : General Electric ...... 75.000 "Freisetzungen" ?!?


Ralph
02.02.2001, 06:12
Dies ist zumindest, was einige gehört haben wollen. Das wären ca. 15% der GE-Beschäftigten und ein Level an Entlassungen, den man seit 20 Jahren bei GE nicht mehr gesehen hat.

************************************************************
GE to slice 75,000 jobs?

By William Spain, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 4:05 PM ET Feb 1, 2001

FAIRFIELD, Conn. (CBS.MW) -- In what would be the biggest in a series of recent corporate layoffs, BusinessWeek is reporting that General Electric is getting ready to eliminate tens of thousands of jobs over the next two years.
General Electric (GE: news, msgs) has denied the accuracy of the story, reported on Thursday morning, that the company would slice 75,000 -- about 15 percent of its total -- workers as a result of the slowing economy and its pending acquisition of Honeywell International (HON: news, msgs) .

Citing unnamed analysts "who have spoken with GE officials," the magazine reported that Honeywell would bear the brunt of the cuts, with approximately 50,000 of its 120,000 workers being laid off.

The story, however, was not the first report of a huge potential toll among GE's workers.

GE spokesman Gary Sheffer talked briefly with CBS.MarketWatch.com late Wednesday after a report that GE would cut between 60,000 and 80,000 workers appeared on Internet bulletin board F___dCompany.com.

"This has been written about before," he said. "But we don't plan layoffs that way, and we never announce overall layoffs that way."

That said, "it is clear that we are going to need fewer jobs at GE," due to the bankruptcy of Montgomery Ward, integration of Honeywell, "modest" volume-related reductions and "our continuing digitization activities," Sheffer added.

About 28,000 workers were let go as result of the Montgomery Ward meltdown. See full story. But Business Week said that number was not included in 75,000 jobs it reported would be cut in the next two years.

Analyst Kent Newcomb of A.G. Edwards confirmed that the company does not typically plan company-wide job cuts, preferring to let each of its myriad divisions wield its own ax.

However, "economic conditions would dictate some layoffs, and the Honeywell integration would dictate even more." Newcomb declined to speculate on the total number involved.

Before the Honeywell merger, General Electric had about 340,000 employees and was already among the world's largest private employers.

In January, GE Chairman Jack Welch publicly warned that "significant" layoffs could be imminent. Some cutbacks have already begun. For instance, just before Christmas, the company began staff cuts at a Bloomington, Ind., refrigerator production facility that will eventually cost the jobs of 1,400.

Investors seemed to take the news in stride: Shares of GE closed up 25 cents to $46.23 on Thursday.
************************************************************

Ralph

Ralph
03.02.2001, 16:46
Auch die Businessweek von diesem Wochenende hat einen interessanten Bericht zu diesem "Vorhaben" ! .... von dem man annehmen muss, dass es stimmt.

At GE, Neutron Jack Is Back

To keep its profit growth engine humming, CEO Jack Welch plans to cut at least 75,000 jobs, hoping Web efficiencies will fill the gap

As GE's John F. Welch Jr. heads for retirement, his legacy as Neutron Jack continues. Back in 1981, a 45-year-old Welch settled into his new job as chief executive of General Electric Co. by promptly dismantling many of GE's old-line businesses and hacking away layers of bureaucracy in the big conglomerate. After four years, he had managed to cut some 100,000 jobs, a feat that set GE on its now-legendary course of growth and ever-increasing profits -- and one that earned Welch his infamous nickname of Neutron Jack. Now, at 65 as he's supposed to be winding down his career, it looks as if Neutron Jack is roaring back.

Wall Street sources and people close to the company tell BusinessWeek that GE is planning massive job cuts on a scale not seen since the early days of Welch's tenure. GE may take out at least 75,000 jobs in the next two years --or more than 15% of the 450,000 people it'll employ once the Honeywell International merger is completed. Excluded from the estimates are the 28,000 jobs that will go as a result of GE's decision to shut retailer Montgomery Ward & Co.

LION'S SHARE. To be sure, these cuts are coming at a time the economy is slowing to a crawl. Analysts say GE may eliminate 5,000 to 10,000 jobs in appliances, lighting, broadcasting, and plastics. Those divisions are all highly sensitive to swings in the economy, and they posted marked slowdowns in fourth-quarter sales as car manufacturers, computer makers, retailers, and other key customers cut way back on orders.

But while a limping economy may lend added incentive for layoffs, most of the planned cuts have little connection to the economy's current performance, analysts and people close to the company say. Indeed, the lion's share will come from the upcoming merger with Morristown (N.J.)-based Honeywell and GE's efforts to push mightily into e-commerce. GE may cut 30,000 to 50,000 jobs -- as much as 42% of Honeywell's base -- in the wake of the merger, according to analysts who have spoken with GE officials.

Just as important, analysts say, GE is signaling that it's ready to make deep structural changes by migrating reams of administrative work to the Web, allowing it to cut entire layers of support jobs and white-collar positions. Indeed, GE expects to save $1.6 billion on so-called "digitization" this year and eliminate 11,000 jobs. In coming years, cuts from this Web migration -- if it goes successfully and customers embrace it -- could eliminate tens of thousand more jobs, analysts say.

Why now? Analyst Martin A. Sankey of Goldman Sachs says technology is allowing GE to "radically delayer," just as it did in the early '80s. "It's a sensitive issue because a lot of people are going to be losing jobs." No division will be spared. GE Capital Services, the company's finance arm and a consistent source of high double-digit profit growth, is expected to generate at least a third of this year's $1.6 billion in e-commerce savings.

BABY STEPS. In recent months, GE Capital has begun aggressively pushing much of its paperwork -- from loan applications to insurance sales -- to the Web. As a service business, analysts and employees say it's rife with opportunities to cut jobs. But the same goes for old-line businesses such as appliances. Sankey notes that the millions of calls that go to the appliance unit's call center cost $5 to $6 apiece to handle. "If you can route that call to the GE appliance Web site, that interaction is 50 cents," he says. Still, many of GE's Web efforts are in their infancy, and analysts say it may be several years before the Web investments pay off.

GE says it has no layoff targets, but Welch has spoken recently of "significant" cuts. With Honeywell, they're likely to be significant indeed. That company had failed to move ahead with the integration of its large merger with Allied Signal, say analysts and frustrated Honeywell directors. And there's clear evidence that Honeywell is bloated: While its average employee generates about $209,000 in revenue, GE employees generate $382,000 apiece. Clearly, Welch sees some big potential for job cuts. GE recently increased the estimated annual cost savings from the Honeywell merger to $2.5 billion from the original $1.5 billion it had projected.

Still, outside of the Honeywell merger, it might seem odd that GE, long considered the consummate lean American corporation, now thinks it has at least 75,000 jobs to shave. After all, it just cranked out record earnings in 2000. Even in the anemic fourth quarter, as some of its industrial competitors struggled, the GE magic was in full evidence. While sales were flat or down in appliances, broadcasting, industrial products, and plastics, earnings overall still increased by 16%.

But the company is pushing some very aggressive profit targets for 2001 --recession or no recession. With moderate economic growth, GE projects earnings will grow 18% to 20%. And even if the economy contracts by 2%, GE says it will still have double-digit earnings growth, albeit smaller -- about 10%. With such big job cuts on the way, Welch just may have the formula to keep those earnings chugging.

<IMG SRC="http://charts.cnbc.com/jetson/GR-D-GE-0.8054158794944928-2-0-0-520-460-212-S_208_30_0_D_D_S_210_D_D_D_D_-ind.gif" border=0>

Ralph, dem diese Entwicklung absolut NICHT gefällt !

Ralph
03.02.2001, 16:58
Ich muss sagen, solche Entwicklungen schocken mich immer wieder aufs neue .... das war 1990/91 nicht anders als heute. Ich will jetzt keinen auf "sentimental" machen, aber man muss sich überlegen, dass hinter JEDER dieser Freisetzung (was ein hässliches Wort http://www.stock-channel.net/Board/smilies/frown.gif ) ein persönliches Schicksal steht.

denn im Vergleich mit 1990/91 werden die amerikansichen Unternehmen wohl nie wieder einen solch hohen Beschäftigungsgrad benötigen .... dies wird die Sockelarbeitslosigkeit in USA deutlich erhöhen. Aufgrund des immer noch relativ geringen Bildugnsstandes in vielen Beschäftigungssparten wird die Lücke, die Clinton so vortrefflich in den letzten Jahren schliessen konnte, zwischen Arm und Reich vermutlich wieder weiter auseinander gerissen werden.

Das auch viele Marktbeobachter, Entlassungen als nicht gerade probates Mittel der Effizienzsteigerung sehen, zeigt der nachfolgende Artikel von CNBC.

***********************************************************
Market Watchers Mixed on Layoffs

By Stephanie Mercurio
CNBC.com Markets Reporter

Feb 3, 2001 10:00 AM

The decelerating economy is taking its toll on companies in almost every sector. In response to slowing sales and falling earnings, many companies have begun to lay off employees in order to cut costs.

Amazon.com {AMZN, News, Boards}, Intel {INTC, News, Boards}, DaimlerChrysler {DCX, News, Boards}, General Electric {GE, News, Boards} and JDS Uniphase {JDSU, News, Boards} are just a sampling of the companies slashing their workforces.

Investors generally perceive layoffs as a positive development. They expect reduced payroll costs to firm up the bottom line, helping to make up for sales shortfalls.


"Wall Street loves job cuts, because there is the perception that it lowers the cost structure and at the same time it creates a better corporate structure," says Barry Hyman, chief investment officer for Weatherly Securities.

But so far, companies announcing big staff reductions have reaped little reward from Wall Street. Amazon.com and DaimlerChrysler are among the latest to announce layoffs, and so far, shares of both have continued to fall. GE shares have been treading water, and Intel has managed a modest rally.

After the disappointing fourth-quarter earnings season, analysts say layoffs may help rebuild investor confidence in corporate planning. Signs that companies are striving to improve their financial standing could inspire investors to dive back into the market, some analysts believe. Combine that with an aggressive Federal Reserve, and market watchers say the worst of the economic downturn could be over.

"We are at least halfway through (the layoffs)," says Tim Woolston, fund manager for Boston Advisors. "When we start seeing so many announcements, we know we are least halfway through."

According to outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, corporations laid off 133,713 employees in December alone - the highest number in a single month and the fourth time the figure broke 100,000 since the firm first began its survey in 1993.

To be sure, the layoffs do provide temporary relief for corporate expenses, but contrarians say the layoffs only offer a short-term solution. Staff reductions cut the fat, but they also cut the muscles needed for growth, says Brett Gallagher, head of U.S. equities and deputy chief investment officer at Julius Baer Investment Management.

Gallagher prefers other kinds of cost reductions. He points to AK Steel {AKS, News, Boards}, which recently cut its dividend in half but decided to hold on to its workers.

"I don't think it accomplishes anything other than provide a short-term fix for earnings in the (upcoming) quarters," says Gallagher. "All it really does is, in the near term, reduce expenses. Nobody ever grows by cutting expenses. It is nothing more than a near-term fix. I don't look at it positively."

Gallagher believes aggressive Fed rate cuts will provide growth opportunities for companies with the fortitude to keep their staffs intact.
***********************************************************

Ralph, nachdenklich und noch Schlimmeres befürchtend

Ralph
03.02.2001, 17:04
Dass es für viele Amerikaner dieses Mal anders sein dürfte, als 1990/91 zeigen die Artikel auf der folgenden Newsweek-Seite.

Arbeitsplatzabbau in USA ..... dieses Mal wird es anders ! (http://www.msnbc.com/news/NW-biz_Front.asp)

Ralph

Ralph
30.04.2001, 21:55
Anhand des obigen Charts kann man sehr gut erkennen, dass GE ihren Abwärtstrend überwunden hat, über den DMAs notier tund jetzt etwas konsloidiert ......

Die Mid-40 ($45-46) wären für mich ein Einstiegslevel ..... so steht's geschrieben (auf meiner WL), so soll es geschehen ! (fei nach den "Die zehn Gebote").

Was meint Ihr zu der Idee ?

Ralph

Ralph
02.08.2001, 22:45
http://www.stock-channel.net/usergfx/ralph/Stocks/GE_d310701.gif

Ralph, kurz und schmerzlos

Ralph
26.09.2001, 22:18
Goldman Sachs hat heute die Gewinnschätzungen von GE angehoben ! :eek

8:17AM General Electric (GE) 35.50: Goldman Sachs raises earnings estimates; says the negative impact of September 11 on GE's insurance, aircraft engines, and aircraft leasing operations have been quantified and deemed manageable; believes valuation is now attractive at a market multiple or less versus the S&P 500, down sharply from the 35-50% premium of recent years; expects more positive catalysts over the next three months including management presentations and a dividend increase in December.

Mal sehen !

Ralph

Ralph
30.10.2001, 19:33
http://www.stock-channel.net/usergfx/ralph/Stocks/GE_d301001.gif

Ralph